Showing posts with label Summit Entertainment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Summit Entertainment. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Review - A Better Life


Grade: B-

Good: Demian Bichir’s powerful performance as Carlos; Affecting portrait of a father’s struggle to provide, survive and thrive.

Bad: Grating, rote anti-gang subplot; Jose Julian as Carlos’ son Luis can be annoying in the early stages; Hints of a political agenda.

Ugly: The treatment some of the illegal immigrants face just to pursue a dream Americans take for granted.

Anytime I hear someone refer to the “American Dream” I can’t help but think they’re being a bit disingenuous, and arrogant. Americans aren’t, and never have been, the only people pursuing happiness, and America isn’t the only place to live a comfortable, fulfilling life. But, for so many, it offers the hope, and often nothing more, of a better life. Director Chris Weitz examines how far one father will go in pursuit of a better life for himself and his son in Summit’s new drama, A Better Life.

The immigration debate is at the center of this drama, which follows illegal Mexican immigrant Carlos Galindo (Demian Bichir) as he comes within reach of escaping a life of inconsistent work and constant paranoia. Carlos makes his living as a day laborer in East Los Angeles, using the scant, menial wages he earns to support his son, Luis (Jose Julian), a restless teen tempted by the gang life that swallows so many young men of color whole. When Carlos’ friend and most “reliable” employer, Blasco (Joaquin Cosio), offers to sell him a truck filled with landscaping tools, Carlos sees the opportunity to run his own business and pull his family away from the hard life in the East L.A. barrio. For a day, Carlos sees a better future, but, after the truck is stolen, he embarks on a desperate mission to reclaim his future and reconnect with his son.

No matter what side of the immigration debate you fall on, you will be moved by Bichir’s restrained, yet powerful performance as Carlos. Bichir is superb, giving Carlos the quiet dignity and reserve of a leading man from a bygone era. Bichir’s Carlos is selfless—he sleeps on a couch while his son has a bedroom to himself—fearless—he climbs an easily five-story palm tree without hesitation just to cut a few leaves—and genial—in the search for his truck, he shows all those who help him the utmost compassion, often offering what little money he has in return for information—in a way that few lead characters are today. In the era of the HBO-style anti-hero, Carlos is refreshingly retro, an old-school “man’s man” hero in the place where audiences would least expect him. He is also a man of resounding depth. He may bottle up his emotions, but he does not disregard them. When Carlos faces a devastating circumstance near the film’s end, every ounce of emotion he reveals rings true and will surely move the most jaded viewers to tears.

Jose Julian, as Carlos’ son Luis, fares less impressively, playing a fiery counterpart to his father’s noble stoicism. Luis is unmotivated, aggressive and annoying, everything his father is not—and seeing Carlos forced to deal with his son’s brattiness is infuriating. Even worse, he’s saddled with a rote subplot about potentially joining a gang that is populated by some pretty sad Chicano stereotypes, including the tatted gangster (Gabriel Chavarria), boorish chola (Chelsea Rendon) and mouthy wannabe (Bobby Soto). As a counterpoint to his father and an example of the disconnect between American-born children of immigrants, Julian’s Luis is effective, but he’s so unlikeable that it’s hard to connect with him until the midpoint of the film. A scene where Luis and his father attend a traditional Mexican rodeo is particularly effective in making Luis more than a typical movie teen while cementing his father’s motivations.

Despite some missteps with Luis, director Chris Weitz, best known for daring to tackle adaptations of The Golden Compass and Twilight: New Moon, paints a solid picture of the immigrant struggle. Granted, images of East LA filled with day laborers, gangs, and muted sunshine are not terribly original, but Weitz never plays the exploitation angle. The people of these neighborhoods are generally rendered with the respect and compassion they are due. Just seeing so many of the adult East Angelinos working crap jobs under discouraging conditions shows how far these folks are willing to go to survive and, maybe, thrive. If anything, Weitz film shows that the “American Dream” is still alive, even if Americans aren’t the ones pursuing it.

Aside from its compassion toward its subjects, the film’s greatest assets are the simplicity of its plot and the palpable air of paranoia. Carlos is not pursuing some one in a million opportunity to become extraordinarily wealthy. He simply wants the opportunity to work and provide for his son. The fact that this all revolves around a pickup truck with tools is great because that truck is no mere McGuffin; it is both a symbol of that better life and the means to reach it. The only thing that stands in Carlos’ way is the possibility of being caught and deported. There is an inconsistent sense that any mistake Carlos makes will expose him to the authorities. In the early goings, the concept of deportation seems like a boogeyman, but near the climax it becomes a true threat. If Weitz had put a bit more emphasis on this throughout, the film would have been measurably stronger.

A Better Life is at its best when it allows the audience to witness and empathize with Carlos’ struggle. Sure, Carlos comes off as a little bit too good to be true, but who’s to say that a fair number of people in his position aren’t decent and hardworking. Conversely, the portions focused on Luis and the encroaching threat of gangs is hackneyed and grating. Audiences may roll their eyes at Luis storyline, but they’ll be hard pressed to not feel something when the movie zeroes in on the growing connection between father and son. Now, folks in the audience who are sensitive on the immigration issue may bristle at this film—as there is a clear agenda in place—but if they can get beyond their views, they’ll be rewarded with an affecting portrait of the new face of the American Dream.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Review: Drive Angry 3D


Grade: C

Upside: Visceral gory action and gratuitous nudity, with sly self-awareness, that's sure to please fans of 21st century grindhouse flicks like Machete.

Downside: Generally unoriginal with archetypal characters and falls flat when trying to add any depth.

I can imagine the pitch for Summit Entertainment's new Nicolas Cage vehicle, Drive Angry (Shot in 3D!): 21st Century Grindhouse! It’s The Crow meets Death Proof!

Tarantino would’ve killed to direct this in his heyday.

Unfortunately, the duty of directing one of the purest examples of 70’s era B-movie schlock in years falls to Direct-to-DVD vet Patrick Lussier. In Drive Angry, Lussier directs Nicolas Cage through ridiculously violent and brazen revenge fantasy. Cage plays the cleverly—to some—named John Milton, an escapee from Hell dead set on saving his granddaughter from slimy six-gun slinging Satanist Jonah King (Twilight’s Billy Burke). Milton is accompanied on his roaring rampage of vengeance by Amber Heard’s Piper, a Southern-fried pistol and dead ringer for Friday Night Lights’ Tyra Collette. Tailing Milton and Piper is a snarky soul collector known only as the Accountant, played by perennial ‘That Guy’ William Fichtner with his usual ticks turned up to 100.

Fichtner is not the only one who has turned the intensity up for this flick. Everything about Drive Angry is beyond over-the-top. From the cartoonish violence to the abundant nudity, this flick operates almost exclusively on Badass Logic and slavishly follows the Rule of Cool. Whether this works largely depends on your taste and tolerance for the hallowed conventions of grindhouse cinema. Taken at face value, Drive Angry’s hard ‘R’ qualities—including gunshots to the eye, a shootout during sex (ripped straight from another 21st century big budget B-movie, 2007’s Shoot’em Up) and a plethora of limbs destroyed by buck shots—could be appalling. Thankfully, the makers of Drive Angry don’t take the material seriously and the sly awareness of the flick’s B-movie roots makes it more digestible than it has any right to be.

The performances, on the other hand, are much harder to swallow. Cage hams it up, as usual, with his trademark stilted delivery that ranges from quirky cool to laughably explosive. Heard fares a little better, playing Piper with just the right amount of spunk of vulnerability to avoid be grating. Burke and Fichtner do serviceable jobs as antagonists, but neither brings anything original to characters that most audiences have seen before, which is the main problem with Drive Angry.

There’s nothing new here. Lussier does competent work that is at times thrilling, but is mostly a series of shots, characters and plot points that even the most casual moviegoers would recognize. One would think that with carte blanche to go balls-to-the-wall Lussier and his team would be a bit more creative. If Lussier couldn’t give the flick a bit more originality, at least he could’ve given it some depth. Sadly, anytime Drive Angry tries to switch gears and show some character growth or even something resembling real emotion, it falls flat. Trust me, it’s never a good sign when the audience laughs at the most dramatic scenes. Despite these failings, Drive Angry succeeds in being exactly what it seems to be on the tin: a total turn-off-your-brain experience in 3D(which is noticeably clearer and more effective than recent 3D releases, thanks to some cool effects with objects shooting towards the audience). If you can manage to ignore the B-movie styling, unoriginal characters and rehashed plot, or you just love movies like Machete or Death Proof then Drive Angry is right up your alley. If not, it’d be your best interest to drive away from this undercooked revenge flick.